Betting On The Number Of Finishers In A Cheltenham Race

Whataretheodds » Cheltenham Festival » Betting On The Number Of Finishers In A Cheltenham Race

I’ve always been drawn to the more unconventional betting markets at the Cheltenham Festival, and one that consistently captures my imagination is wagering on the number of finishers in a race. While everyone else is focused on who will win, I’m often just as intrigued by the simple question of how many horses will actually complete the course. It’s a market that forces me to think about a race in an entirely different way, moving beyond form and class to consider grit, stamina, and the brutal demands of the track itself.

My analysis for this market starts with a deep dive into the going. The ground conditions at Prestbury Park are arguably the most important factor. If the ground is officially described as Good to Soft or better, I generally expect a higher number of finishers. Horses are less likely to tire dramatically or make tired mistakes. However, if the forecast points towards Heavy or Soft ground, my thinking shifts immediately. That’s when the real war of attrition begins, and the number of finishers can plummet, especially in longer-distance races like the Stayers’ Hurdle or the Gold Cup.

Next, I scrutinise the size of the field and the nature of the race itself. A large, competitive handicap chase with 20+ runners is a very different prospect to a small, select field of five for a novice hurdle. In a big field, the chances of interference, falls, and being brought down are naturally higher, particularly at the first few fences where the crowd is bunched tightly. I pay close attention to the early pace; if there are multiple front-runners, a ferocious gallop can lead to a higher attrition rate, cutting down the number of finishers.

The specific course and distance are permanently etched in my mind. The Cheltenham Hill is the great leveller. A race like the Supreme Novices’ Hurdle, run on the Old Course, has a tendency to be a frantic affair, and novice hurdlers can make mistakes under pressure. Conversely, the Cross Country Chase is a unique test, but its slower pace and specialist nature can sometimes see a high percentage of runners complete the course, barring any mishaps at the quirky obstacles.

I also look at the individual runners. I’m not just looking for the best jumper; I’m looking for the dour, relentless stayers—the horses who might not have the pace to win but possess the heart and stamina to grind their way to the finish line long after the winner has passed the post. These horses are my best friends in this market. I also note any horses with a history of pulling up or being a doubtful stayer, as they are prime candidates to reduce the final tally.

When I finally place my bet, I’m usually choosing between an Over/Under line set by the bookmaker. If my research points towards a gruelling test on heavy ground with a large, frantic field, I’m leaning towards the ‘Under’. If conditions are good and the race looks like it might be steadily run, I’m more inclined to back the ‘Over’. The key for me is synthesising all the factors—ground, pace, course, and runner profiles—into one cohesive prediction.

There’s a unique thrill in watching a race unfold with this bet in mind. As the field thins out over the final few fences, my focus isn’t solely on the leader. I’m counting the tired horses being pushed along, cheering for that straggler in fifth to keep going, and wincing when a faller reduces my number. It adds a completely different layer of drama to the spectacle. Betting on the number of finishers has deepened my appreciation for the sheer toughness required to simply complete a race at the Cheltenham Festival, and for me, that’s a fascinating story in itself.